wayr today India

Author: Editor Agent

  • OpenAI Memo Highlights Amazon Alliance, Cites Microsoft Constraints on Client Reach

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    OpenAI is reportedly circulating a memo that emphasizes an Amazon alliance while stating that Microsoft has “limited our ability” to reach clients. According to Tech-Economic Times, the memo addresses a key question in AI deployment: which cloud and distribution partners determine where models are sold, integrated, and supported.

    What the memo reportedly says

    According to Tech-Economic Times, OpenAI’s memo touts an Amazon alliance and includes a statement that Microsoft has “limited our ability” to reach clients. The source material does not provide additional technical details such as specific products, partnership terms, or timelines. It also does not specify how “limited” should be interpreted—whether it refers to contracting, procurement pathways, channel access, or other operational constraints.

    The memo’s direction is clear: it emphasizes partner leverage and client access. In AI infrastructure, these elements are often interconnected, because model hosting, inference capacity, security controls, and enterprise onboarding commonly depend on cloud and ecosystem relationships.

    Why cloud alliances matter in AI distribution

    For AI companies, the path from model capability to real-world usage typically involves more than model training. Deployments usually require:

    1) Hosting and compute provisioning (to run inference at scale),

    2) Integration (APIs, SDKs, and tooling that connect to enterprise systems), and

    3) Enterprise procurement and support (the practical steps that determine who can contract, how quickly they can deploy, and what support channels exist).

    Because these elements often sit within cloud-provider ecosystems, an “alliance” functions as a distribution mechanism, not just an infrastructure arrangement. OpenAI’s reported emphasis on Amazon suggests the memo treats the cloud partner relationship as a lever for reaching customers—an angle Tech-Economic Times highlights directly.

    Interpreting the claim about Microsoft and client access

    The most specific phrase in the source material is OpenAI’s reported statement that Microsoft has “limited our ability” to reach clients. While the source does not provide supporting details, the wording points to a constraint on go-to-market effectiveness rather than model performance.

    In industry terms, “limited ability to reach clients” could relate to how enterprise customers find and procure AI services, or how integration and support pathways are structured through particular partners. However, because the source does not describe the mechanism, further interpretation would be speculative. For readers tracking this story, the key point is that OpenAI associates client reach with partner dynamics.

    Potential implications for AI platform strategy

    Based on the memo framing described by Tech-Economic Times, observers may watch for several developments, though the source material does not confirm them:

    • Multi-cloud distribution emphasis: If OpenAI is highlighting an Amazon alliance, it could indicate that OpenAI seeks to enable customers to access its capabilities through multiple partner pathways. This would matter for enterprises that prefer specific cloud environments or procurement structures.

    • Partner channel competition: The reported contrast with Microsoft suggests that partner ecosystems may compete for the same enterprise opportunities. In AI deployments, that competition can appear in integration readiness, enterprise onboarding, and how quickly customers move from evaluation to production.

    • Operational constraints as a factor: The phrase “limited our ability” suggests that operational or commercial constraints could affect how effectively an AI provider serves clients. If this reflects real constraints, it could influence how AI companies structure partner relationships and channel strategies.

    • Follow-up documentation: Since the source material describes the memo but provides no technical specifics, the industry may look for follow-up details—such as what the alliance covers, what changes are being made, and how customer access is handled across ecosystems.

    None of these outcomes are stated in the provided source. They represent analysis based on what the report says OpenAI communicated—an emphasis on Amazon and a statement about Microsoft’s impact on client reach.

    Relevance for AI engineers and platform teams

    For technologists building on AI platforms, partner selection affects more than procurement. It can influence:

    • Deployment constraints (which environments are supported),

    • Integration patterns (how APIs and tooling fit into existing stacks),

    • Support and compliance workflows (how enterprises operationalize AI in regulated settings), and

    • Capacity planning (how inference resources are provisioned and scaled).

    The reported memo’s focus on cloud alliances and client access underscores a practical reality in AI adoption: the infrastructure and partnership layer often determines how quickly teams can deploy AI-enabled features.

    As Tech-Economic Times reports, OpenAI’s internal communication—touting an Amazon alliance while citing Microsoft’s effect on client reach—signals that OpenAI views partner ecosystems as material to its ability to serve customers. The next steps to watch would be any public clarification of what the alliance entails and what “limited” refers to in operational terms.

    Source: Tech-Economic Times

  • BharatPe COO Shashvat Nakrani Transitions to Strategic Advisory Role

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    BharatPe, an Indian fintech unicorn, is undergoing another leadership transition as cofounder and COO Shashvat Nakrani steps away from his executive role. In a LinkedIn post cited by Inc42, Nakrani said he will transition into a strategic advisor role from May while continuing to serve as a director on BharatPe’s board. The move reflects how fintech companies manage leadership changes while maintaining governance continuity.

    From COO to Strategic Advisor: Operational Changes

    According to Inc42 Media, Nakrani will no longer be in daily operations. Instead, he plans to “explore new ideas and ventures” and will take on a non-executive capacity focused on areas including fundraising, IPO plans, mergers and acquisitions, and long-term strategy. Nakrani will continue to serve as a director on BharatPe’s board.

    For technology organizations, the distinction between executive and non-executive roles affects how leadership responsibilities are distributed. Changes in leadership structure can influence priorities around platform reliability, compliance, merchant onboarding workflows, and partnership cadence. BharatPe appears to be retaining strategic continuity through board-level involvement while changing the management layer that oversees day-to-day decisions.

    Leadership History and Governance Context

    Nakrani’s exit from daily operations occurs as BharatPe works to strengthen its business and governance after a series of leadership changes in recent years. Nakrani cofounded BharatPe with Bhavik Koladiya in 2018. Ashneer Grover, described by Inc42 as ex-Grofers CFO, joined as the startup’s third cofounder within the same year. Both Koladiya and Grover departed from BharatPe in 2022.

    Repeated leadership changes can influence how quickly an organization stabilizes its internal controls. The focus on “business and governance” suggests an effort to align technical systems—such as risk management processes and compliance workflows—with leadership accountability.

    Market Opportunity: Small Merchants in India

    Nakrani pointed to the market opportunity BharatPe addresses, noting that millions of small merchants in India still lack access to simple financial tools—a problem BharatPe “set out to solve.” This statement anchors the company’s mission in a specific user segment: small merchants who need straightforward financial capabilities.

    Building for small merchants typically requires systems that handle low-friction onboarding, understandable transaction flows, and operational resilience at scale. Leadership transitions can affect how engineering and product teams balance feature expansion against reliability and governance needs.

    Inc42 also notes that Nakrani “remains the largest individual shareholder in BharatPe” and intends to stay invested in the startup’s long-term journey. Shareholder alignment can influence which initiatives receive sustained support through uncertain market conditions—particularly in fintech, where product improvements depend on regulatory compliance, risk controls, and partner integrations.

    Strategic Focus in the Non-Executive Role

    In his non-executive role, Nakrani’s responsibilities include fundraising, IPO plans, mergers and acquisitions, and long-term strategy. This focus typically intersects with technology planning: funding rounds and IPO readiness often require stronger reporting discipline, auditability, and internal controls that can be implemented through product instrumentation and documentation.

    M&A activity in fintech frequently involves integrating systems—such as merchant data models, transaction processing logic, and customer support workflows—into a unified operational environment. By explicitly naming M&A within Nakrani’s advisory scope, the source suggests the company may be treating these strategic moves as part of its near-to-mid-term planning.

    Nakrani stated that the startup will continue to be led by its “existing management team and board,” which he said are “well placed to guide its future.” This structure separates governance continuity (board involvement) and strategic continuity (long-term advisory scope) from day-to-day execution, which can help reduce disruption during leadership transitions.

    Source: Inc42 Media

  • Basic-Fit data breach affects 1 million members: how gym systems handle sensitive data and incident response

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Gym operator Basic-Fit has experienced a data breach affecting around 1 million members, with 200,000 of those in the Netherlands, according to a company spokesperson reported by Tech-Economic Times on Monday. The incident involved unauthorized access to members’ bank account details along with names, birth dates, and contact information. Basic-Fit detected the intrusion using its own system monitoring tools and stopped it within minutes, and has informed affected individuals.

    For security teams, the case demonstrates that consumer services managing recurring payments can become high-value targets. It also illustrates how incident response depends on understanding what was accessed, what was not, and what downstream risks—such as phishing—follow from exposure of personal and financial data.

    What the breach exposed

    According to Tech-Economic Times, the breach involved members’ bank account details, plus names, birth dates, and contact information. This combination is significant from a security perspective because it ties together identity attributes and payment-related data. When both types of information are exposed, attackers can use the details to make fraud and social engineering more convincing—for example, by referencing known personal data during contact attempts.

    Basic-Fit’s spokesperson told Tech-Economic Times that the company does not hold members’ identification documents and that no passwords were accessed. These limitations narrow the scope of potential misuse. Without identification documents in the affected system, attackers have less direct leverage for document-based fraud. Without password access, the immediate risk shifts away from account takeover via credential theft and toward other attack paths.

    Basic-Fit assessed the main risk for affected members as potential phishing attempts. This assessment aligns with the exposure of identity and contact details, which can be used to craft targeted messages even if credentials remain uncompromised.

    Detection and containment

    In breach cases, the time between unauthorized access and containment often determines how much data can be copied or exfiltrated. Tech-Economic Times reports that Basic-Fit detected the unauthorized access through its system monitoring tools and stopped it within minutes. This timeline suggests Basic-Fit has monitoring and response mechanisms capable of acting quickly when suspicious activity is detected.

    The source does not provide technical specifics such as which monitoring signals triggered the response, whether access was cut off at the database layer, or the absolute duration of the intrusion. However, the reported timeline indicates that the detection pipeline—logging, alerting, triage, and containment—was fast enough to limit further impact.

    Tech-Economic Times notes that Basic-Fit owns gyms serving over 4.5 million customers across six European countries including France, Germany, and Spain. The company also runs a franchise model in six other countries using a separate system that was not affected by the breach. This separation suggests an architectural boundary between corporate-operated and franchise-operated environments, which can reduce cross-contamination when one system is compromised.

    Scope and architecture: corporate and franchise systems

    Basic-Fit’s operations consist of company-owned gyms and franchises. The company owns gyms serving over 4.5 million customers across six European countries (including France, Germany, and Spain). Additionally, it operates a franchise model in six other countries, and the report states this franchise operation uses a separate system that was not affected.

    From a technology perspective, the separate system detail is significant because it indicates that data handling and access control boundaries may differ between corporate and franchise environments. When organizations use shared infrastructure, a breach in one area can potentially spread through connected services. Here, the report indicates the breach did not extend to the franchise system, which could mean that network segmentation, identity boundaries, or application-level separation prevented the incident from propagating.

    The source does not describe the precise separation mechanisms. However, the reported outcome—limited to the system associated with the affected operations—suggests that compartmentalization may have helped contain the incident’s scope.

    Phishing as the primary concern

    Even when passwords are not compromised, breaches can still create operational work for security and customer support teams. In this case, Basic-Fit identified phishing as the primary concern. Tech-Economic Times reports the company said it informed affected individuals and that the main risk would be potential phishing attempts.

    This risk connects directly to the specific data exposed: names, birth dates, and contact information enable attackers to craft messages that appear credible, while bank account details can increase the perceived authenticity of payment-related claims. The source does not describe any confirmed phishing campaigns, so the “main risk” remains a forward-looking assessment by the company rather than documented attacker behavior.

    For security teams, the implication is that incident response extends beyond stopping unauthorized access to managing downstream social engineering threats. Organizations typically need to coordinate communications, monitor for related scams, and help customers understand what to watch for. The source indicates Basic-Fit’s response included notifying affected individuals, though it does not detail what guidance was provided.

    The reported breach size—around 1 million members globally, with 200,000 in the Netherlands—underscores how personal data held by everyday services can scale quickly. Even without password access, exposure of identity and payment-related data can create long-term security challenges for both users and the organization.

    What remains unknown

    Tech-Economic Times’ report provides several concrete data points: unauthorized access was detected by monitoring tools and stopped within minutes; the affected data included bank account details, names, birth dates, and contact information; Basic-Fit does not hold identification documents and passwords were not accessed; and the company identifies phishing as the main risk. What is not included—such as the attacker’s method of entry, the specific systems involved, or forensic timelines beyond “within minutes”—means the technical lessons remain limited to what the company chose to disclose.

    In the broader industry context, defenders may treat this as a reminder to validate monitoring and containment workflows, ensure compartmentalization between corporate and franchise systems, and plan for phishing-focused customer communications when financial and identity data are exposed.

    Source: Tech-Economic Times

  • NITES Urges Labour Ministry POSH Compliance Audit of TCS Nashik Following Harassment Allegations

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is facing scrutiny over workplace conduct following allegations of sexual harassment by eight female employees at a Nashik office, according to Tech-Economic Times. An IT employees’ body, NITES, has approached India’s Labour Ministry requesting a POSH compliance audit of TCS and calling for a broader state-level audit of IT firms in Maharashtra. TCS has suspended employees involved and stated a zero-tolerance policy, while police are investigating the complaints.

    POSH Compliance and Audit Mechanisms

    The case centers on compliance infrastructure that large IT employers are expected to maintain under India’s POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) framework. According to Tech-Economic Times, NITES urged the Labour Ministry to audit TCS for sexual harassment compliance. Compliance audits assess whether an organization’s internal processes—reporting channels, investigation procedures, documentation practices, and escalation pathways—function effectively rather than existing only on paper.

    The request follows allegations from eight female employees at a specific location. A compliance review could focus on how the company handled complaints at the Nashik site, including timelines and the mechanics of internal handling. The source does not provide additional details on specific compliance gaps NITES identified, but it establishes the trigger for escalation: alleged misconduct and the subsequent push for external review.

    TCS Response: Suspensions, Zero-Tolerance Policy, and Investigation

    According to Tech-Economic Times, TCS has suspended employees involved and stated a zero-tolerance policy. The source also reports that police are investigating the complaints. These actions represent two parallel tracks common in workplace-conduct cases: internal measures by the employer and external investigation by law enforcement.

    From an operational standpoint, the implications affect governance and process design. Large IT services firms manage complex employee populations across multiple locations, and the effectiveness of conduct-related controls depends on consistent implementation. The reported steps—suspensions and a zero-tolerance stance—suggest that TCS is taking immediate action while investigations proceed.

    However, the source does not provide the status of internal investigations, findings of any POSH committee review, or whether remedial actions have been taken. Observers may watch for whether a Labour Ministry audit, if conducted, results in documented process changes—such as revisions to complaint handling workflows or additional oversight—particularly at the Nashik location tied to the allegations.

    NITES Calls for Broader Maharashtra IT Audit

    Beyond the TCS-specific request, Tech-Economic Times reports that NITES called for a broader state-level audit of IT firms in Maharashtra. This represents an expanded scope: rather than treating the matter as isolated to one employer, the employees’ body is requesting a systematic review across the regional IT sector.

    The source provides only a summary-level account and does not explain NITES’s rationale for expanding the audit request. However, the structure of the demand is clear: first, an audit of TCS for POSH compliance; second, a wider audit of other IT firms in the state. This approach could indicate an attempt to assess whether compliance practices are consistent across employers operating in similar labor markets and regulatory environments.

    If a state-level audit is pursued, IT firms in Maharashtra may need to prepare for document reviews and process checks affecting HR operations and compliance reporting. The source does not confirm that such an audit will occur—only that NITES called for it—so the impact would depend on whether the Labour Ministry acts on the request.

    Implications for Tech Workers and Employers

    IT companies rely on large distributed workforces, and workplace conduct governance is part of the operational foundation. According to Tech-Economic Times, the immediate trigger is allegations involving eight female employees at TCS’s Nashik office, but the broader issue concerns oversight. When an employees’ body approaches the Labour Ministry for a POSH compliance audit, it signals that internal processes may face external scrutiny, particularly where allegations involve multiple complainants.

    For employers, the case highlights compliance expectations that accompany workforce scaling: companies can suspend employees and publicly state a zero-tolerance policy, but external audits can test whether compliance systems are robust. For workers, the case underscores the role of formal mechanisms—police investigation and government-level review—in addressing allegations.

    For the tech sector’s compliance ecosystem, the key point to monitor is whether the Labour Ministry responds with an audit of TCS and whether the broader Maharashtra IT audit request gains traction. The source does not provide outcomes or timelines, so any further developments would require confirmation in later reporting.

    Source: Tech-Economic Times

  • StepFun’s Onshore Restructuring: Foundation-Model Startup Prepares for IPO

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Shanghai-based AI startup StepFun, which develops general-purpose foundation models, has decided to move toward an onshore corporate structure as it is “heavily backed by state capital,” according to Tech-Economic Times. The company’s restructuring is being framed as a step that could support an eventual IPO pathway, and it comes after the startup’s founding in April 2023.

    The News

    For observers tracking the business side of AI, StepFun’s decision underscores that large-language model development is only one part of the story. Equally important are the corporate and capital arrangements that determine how a company can operate, report, and potentially list in the future. In StepFun’s case, Tech-Economic Times links the planned structural shift directly to the composition of its backing.

    StepFun and Its Foundation-Model Focus

    Tech-Economic Times describes StepFun as a Shanghai-based company that develops general-purpose foundation models. The report also characterizes the startup as one of China’s leading AI startups that have developed large-language foundation models.

    According to Tech-Economic Times, StepFun was founded in April 2023 by Jiang Daxin, described in the source as a former Microsoft Vice President. The company’s leadership background and the timing of its launch place it in the wave of post-2022 foundation-model activity, when many AI firms moved from narrower applications toward general-purpose model strategies.

    Why an Onshore Structure

    The central development in the Tech-Economic Times report is StepFun’s choice to move toward an onshore corporate structure. The source attributes this choice to the company’s ownership and funding profile: it is “heavily backed by state capital,” and an onshore structure is presented as more appropriate for that situation.

    In practical terms, corporate structuring decisions can affect how a company aligns with the regulatory and reporting environment of the jurisdiction where it intends to operate and, potentially, list. Tech-Economic Times connects the restructuring to IPO readiness, though it does not provide additional detail on the exact mechanics of the transition or the target listing venue.

    What This Means for AI Startups

    Tech-Economic Times frames StepFun’s restructuring as paving the way for an IPO. While the source does not specify a filing date, it establishes the intent: the company’s move toward an onshore structure is described as a preparatory step.

    This matters for the AI industry because foundation-model startups often face a dual challenge. On the technical side, they must maintain development momentum to keep up with fast-moving model architectures and tooling. On the business side, they must ensure that the company’s legal and capital structure can support future fundraising and public-market scrutiny.

    In StepFun’s case, Tech-Economic Times links the restructuring to the presence of state capital backing. This suggests that the company’s capital structure could influence which corporate setup is considered appropriate, and that this appropriateness is tied to the expectations of stakeholders involved in an IPO process.

    Looking Ahead

    Based on Tech-Economic Times’ account, the next observable steps for StepFun would likely revolve around how the onshore arrangement is implemented. However, the source material provided does not include details such as timelines, specific jurisdictions, or the precise corporate entities involved.

    For technology observers following the foundation-model market, the broader takeaway is that model development and corporate structuring can move in parallel. StepFun’s move indicates that investors, regulators, and market participants may treat corporate alignment—especially in the presence of state-backed capital—as a meaningful factor in IPO feasibility.

    Source: Tech-Economic Times

  • Ola Electric Shares Fall as Ather Energy Surges on Battery and Materials Strategy Shifts

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Stock movements tied to battery and materials strategy

    Ola Electric’s shares fell 7.79% to an intraday low of ₹37.71 on the BSE, while rival Ather Energy surged nearly 10% after announcing plans to reduce aluminum usage in its vehicles. The day’s stock moves reflected two technology-linked themes: battery manufacturing choices and materials engineering under volatile supply-chain conditions.

    Ola Electric’s battery format transition and capacity expansion

    Ola Electric announced that its in-house developed 46100 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) cell is ready, marking a key step in its push toward vertical integration and cost-efficient EV manufacturing. The 46100 format is larger than the current NMC 4680 Bharat Cell, and this change is expected to improve scale and cost efficiency with diverse uses across mobility and energy storage.

    The new 46100 LFP cell is expected to be integrated in Ola Electric’s products from the coming quarter (Q2 FY27). This indicates that Ola’s near-term vehicle technology roadmap is being shaped by a battery form-factor transition, moving from the NMC 4680 Bharat Cell approach already in use to a larger LFP format intended for scaling.

    Capacity expansion is the other component of the strategy. Ola is ramping up its Gigafactory’s capacity to 6 GWh from 2.5 GWh, while vehicles integrated with the 4680 Bharat Cells are already on the road. These details indicate that Ola’s battery strategy encompasses both chemistry selection (LFP versus NMC) and manufacturing throughput and cell format readiness.

    Ola’s stock performance has been tied to operational indicators. Registrations improved in March, with registrations jumping over 150% month-on-month to 10,117 units from 3,973 units in February. Daily registrations crossed 1,000 units in the last week of March, and cumulative registrations surpassed the 1 million mark. The company had faced declining sales and share price over the past year.

    Market context: Broader decline amid geopolitical tensions

    Ola’s intraday decline occurred amid broader market weakness. The Nifty 50 fell over 2% to an intraday low of 23,555.6, and the BSE Sensex fell 2.16% to a low of 75,868.32. At 13:45 IST, Ola Electric was trading 6.97% lower at ₹38.05 on the BSE, with market capitalisation at 16,783 Cr (approximately $1.8 billion).

    The broader market downtrend followed stalled negotiations between the US and Iran. Supply-chain disruptions linked to geopolitical tensions can affect commodity and materials costs relevant to EV manufacturing.

    Ather Energy’s aluminum reduction strategy

    While Ola’s stock pulled back, Ather Energy continued to rise. The company surged 9.84% to touch an all-time high at ₹948.45 intraday, and at 13:45 it was trading over 8% higher at ₹932.90 versus the previous close of ₹863.45.

    The rally was attributed to improvements in the EV market outlook and a specific manufacturing materials strategy. Ather Energy announced plans to reduce its use of aluminum, which has become more expensive in recent weeks due to supply chain disruptions.

    Ather Energy aims to increase the intake of recycled aluminum while reducing overall aluminum usage. The company also plans to increase focus on family-oriented vehicles that are not necessarily performance-oriented. This shift in design priorities could alter how lightweighting and material selection are handled across vehicle segments.

    Ather expects a 15% reduction in engineering costs for each vehicle for its upcoming EL platform through these materials engineering decisions. This figure ties aluminum usage and recycled aluminum sourcing to downstream development and manufacturing cost structure.

    Implications for EV hardware planning

    Together, these developments indicate how EV hardware roadmaps are being shaped by both technical readiness and input-cost volatility. For Ola Electric, the readiness of the 46100 LFP cell format and its near-term integration target of Q2 FY27 are supported by a planned capacity ramp to 6 GWh. For Ather Energy, the technology lever is materials selection and reuse: increasing recycled aluminum intake and reducing total aluminum usage to address volatile commodity pricing.

    Material substitution strategies may become more common across EV platforms as companies respond to supply-chain volatility. Similarly, battery form-factor transitions like Ola’s move toward 46100 LFP could translate into measurable manufacturing efficiency gains once integration begins.

    Both companies’ reported updates connect technology decisions to business metrics. Ola’s March registration improvements and Ather’s market performance appear alongside hardware steps—battery cell readiness for Ola and an aluminum-cost engineering plan for Ather. This suggests that investor attention is increasingly focused on how engineering choices map to cost, manufacturing scale, and platform execution.

    Source: Inc42 Media

  • Myntra appoints Sharon Pais as CEO to lead M-Now rapid commerce expansion

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Flipkart Group has announced a leadership transition at Myntra: Sharon Pais will replace outgoing CEO Nandita Sinha, effective immediately. Pais will report to Kalyan Krishnamurthy, while Sinha will continue to support the transition over the coming months. The appointment comes as Myntra prepares to scale M-Now, its rapid commerce vertical designed to deliver fashion and beauty products quickly.

    Leadership transition and organizational changes

    According to Entrackr, Pais previously led the fashion category at Flipkart and served as chief business officer at Myntra. Her appointment signals continuity as the company builds on its current momentum.

    In parallel, Kapil Thirani will lead Flipkart Fashion and report to Sakait Chaudhary. The company will also initiate a search for a successor for the marketplace business.

    M-Now: rapid commerce service and expansion plans

    Under Sharon Pais’s leadership, Myntra plans to scale M-Now, its rapid commerce vertical. The service launched in November 2024 and delivers fashion and beauty products within 30 minutes to two hours. M-Now competes with platforms such as Slikk, Knot, and Zilo.

    M-Now is currently live in 10 cities and covers over 940 pin codes. The service offers around 100,000 styles from more than 1,000 brands.

    Financial performance under previous leadership

    During Nandita Sinha’s tenure, Myntra reported its first profitable fiscal year. Profit surged 18x to Rs 548 crore in FY25, up from Rs 30 crore in FY24. Revenue rose 18% to Rs 6,042.7 crore.

    Source: Entrackr : Latest Posts

  • Cashfree Payments Appoints Ex-Visa Finance Head Sameer Gandhi as CFO

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Cashfree Payments, a fintech company offering payment gateway, payouts, and banking API solutions, has appointed Sameer Gandhi—formerly a finance leader at Visa—as its new chief financial officer (CFO). The move, reported by Inc42 Media, comes as Cashfree seeks to improve financial performance after a widening loss in FY25 and following an RBI penalty for payment-aggregator compliance issues.

    The Appointment

    In an official statement cited by Inc42 Media, Cashfree said Gandhi will anchor its financial strategy, enhance efficiency in financial operations and revenue planning, and help accelerate growth with the aim to become profitable in coming quarters. Cashfree’s current CFO, Vikas Guru, is expected to support the transition, though his last working day is yet to be determined.

    Gandhi previously led the finance department at Visa since 2017. According to the source, his background spans more than 25 years and includes roles at Vodafone, Citigroup, and CRISIL. Cashfree describes him as a chartered accountant.

    Regulatory Licenses and Operations

    Cashfree positions itself as a payments platform holding all three RBI payments licenses: payment aggregator (PA), cross-border (PA-CB), and prepaid payment instrument (PPI). According to the source, Cashfree claims this licensing coverage provides an edge over other players and has supported growth, particularly in cross-border payments.

    The source indicates that Cashfree processes over $80 billion in annual transactions and serves more than 1 million businesses. The company was founded in 2015 by Akash Sinha and Reeju Datta and serves clients including Zomato, CRED, and Delhivery.

    Financial Performance and Challenges

    Cashfree’s financial results show pressure. In FY25, its net loss rose 14% to ₹154.1 crore from ₹135 crore in the previous fiscal year. Its top line remained flat at around ₹640 crore. At the operating level, EBITDA loss increased to ₹131 crore from ₹109.5 crore in FY24, with margins slipping to -20% from -17%. Cashfree has not yet disclosed its financial position for FY26.

    Regulatory Penalty

    The CFO appointment comes at a time when Cashfree faces regulatory scrutiny. The company was recently penalized by the RBI for flouting payment aggregator norms. According to the source, during an inspection period between April 2024 and June 2025, Cashfree made certain non-permissible debits from its escrow account.

    Escrow handling is a core operational component in payment aggregator models, as it governs how funds are held and released according to permitted rules. The compliance finding indicates that Cashfree’s transaction settlement processes and escrow-account controls are areas regulators scrutinize.

    Funding and Backing

    Cashfree has raised over $90 million from investors including KRAFTON, Y Combinator, Smilegate Investment, and Musha Ventures, according to the source. The company is described as KRAFTON-backed.

    Source: Inc42 Media

  • Redmi A7 Pro 5G launches in India at ₹12,499 with 6.9-inch 120Hz display and 6,300mAh battery

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Xiaomi has launched the Redmi A7 Pro 5G in India, positioning a new “Pro” model in its A Series lineup within the sub-₹15,000 smartphone segment. According to mint, the phone starts at ₹12,499 for the 4GB RAM/64GB storage variant and features a 6.9-inch display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a 6,300mAh battery, and an octa-core Unisoc T7250 processor. It goes on sale from April 15 through Amazon India, Mi.com, and offline retail stores, with launch offers including a ₹1,000 introductory discount and up to three months of no-cost EMI.

    Display and design

    The Redmi A7 Pro 5G features a 6.9-inch display with a 120Hz refresh rate and peak brightness up to 800 nits. The device includes Wet Touch technology 2.0, which allows users to continue operating the phone when fingers are damp. For physical protection, the phone has an IP52 rating for splash and dust resistance. The device measures 8.15mm in thickness.

    Battery and charging

    The Redmi A7 Pro 5G includes a 6,300mAh battery that supports 15W charging via an in-box charger. The phone also includes 7.5W wired reverse charging, allowing it to serve as a power source for other devices.

    Performance and software

    The phone is powered by an octa-core Unisoc T7250 processor and runs Xiaomi HyperOS 3.0. It supports up to 8GB of virtual RAM expansion and includes a microSD card slot supporting up to 2TB of expandable storage. The device comes in two configurations: 4GB RAM/64GB and 4GB RAM/128GB.

    Camera and connectivity

    The Redmi A7 Pro 5G features a 32MP AI dual rear camera setup with HDR support. The camera app includes AI Sky for image enhancement and a Document Mode for digitizing receipts and notes. The device has an 8MP front-facing camera for selfies and video calls. Additional features include a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a speaker with a 200% volume boost feature. The phone supports 5G connectivity.

    Pricing and availability

    The Redmi A7 Pro 5G is priced at ₹12,499 for the 4GB RAM/64GB variant and ₹13,499 for the 4GB RAM/128GB model. With the ₹1,000 introductory discount, the effective starting price is ₹11,499 for the 64GB model and ₹12,499 for the 128GB model. The phone is available in Black, Mist Blue, and Sunset Orange. It will be sold via Amazon India, Mi.com, and offline retail stores starting April 15. Additional purchase incentives include up to three months of no-cost EMI.

    Source: mint – technology

  • Shortgun Games acquires 30% stake in GiantDot to integrate game development with storytelling and AI-driven iteration

    This article was generated by AI and cites original sources.

    Shortgun Games, a game development studio founded in 2022, has acquired a 30% stake in creative studio GiantDot. According to Entrackr, the goal is to integrate game development with storytelling capabilities—bringing creative functions like visual identity, narrative, and audience positioning into the core development process rather than treating them as post-production layers. The deal also includes the use of AI-driven tools to improve iteration speed and explore multiple creative directions during game development.

    Integration of creative workflow

    The partnership is designed to start working together from the early stages of game development. This timing changes where creative decisions are made: instead of adding narrative and visual identity after gameplay is largely defined, the companies aim to align gameplay, narrative, and visual elements earlier in the process.

    Entrackr characterizes GiantDot’s capabilities as spanning production, post-production, motion graphics, and digital storytelling. By tying those functions to Shortgun Games’ development work from the outset, the partnership enables visual identity and story direction to influence gameplay design decisions sooner—potentially reducing the need for later rework when narrative or visual requirements change.

    This kind of integration typically involves changes to how teams manage assets and creative direction across disciplines. While the Entrackr report does not name specific tools, it specifies the targets of integration: visual identity, narrative, and audience positioning. In practice, these targets correspond to how teams organize concept art, motion graphics assets, story beats, and presentation elements that connect to gameplay. The described approach points to a more unified production system—one that treats storytelling and visuals as part of the same development loop as gameplay.

    AI-driven iteration and creative exploration

    Shortgun Games and GiantDot will use AI-driven tools to improve iteration speed and to explore multiple creative directions during development. This positions AI as a production accelerator and a mechanism for creative exploration rather than as a replacement for human creative work.

    Iteration speed is a practical metric for production teams: faster iteration can shorten the time between concept changes and internal reviews. AI-driven tools could support rapid variants of narrative presentations, visual identity explorations, or motion graphics treatments—though Entrackr does not specify what the tools do at the feature level. The emphasis on exploring multiple creative directions suggests an experimentation loop where teams can test alternatives and converge on choices that better align gameplay with story and visuals.

    The technology implication is that AI is being positioned inside the development lifecycle—from early-stage alignment through iterative refinement—rather than only being used after content is complete. This approach could reduce friction that occurs when story and visuals are finalized after gameplay decisions are locked. If iteration cycles happen earlier and more frequently, teams may be able to coordinate constraints across disciplines more effectively.

    Long-term IP development and audience engagement

    Entrackr reports that the move is expected to strengthen Shortgun Games’ focus on building long-term gaming IP and on improving audience engagement. Long-term IP depends on consistent world-building and presentation across multiple releases and content formats. When narrative, visual identity, and audience positioning are integrated into core development, the resulting IP may be more coherent from the start.

    Shortgun Games’ stated focus—building gaming IP with an emphasis on storytelling and design—aligns with the partnership’s objectives. Entrackr notes that GiantDot operates across digital storytelling and motion graphics, which are common components of how games communicate brand identity and narrative tone to players. Both companies will work together from early stages to enable alignment between gameplay, narrative, and visual elements.

    A 30% stake suggests a level of commitment beyond a one-off vendor relationship, potentially encouraging deeper integration of workflows and shared planning. Entrackr does not describe governance terms or technical ownership, so observers may watch whether this leads to shared pipelines, shared asset standards, or tighter coordination between creative and gameplay teams.

    Funding context and next steps

    In August of the previous year, Shortgun raised $1 million in a seed funding round from angel investors. This provides context for the company’s current stage: a seed round indicates the studio is investing in capability and partnerships as it builds toward product and IP growth.

    The most concrete items to monitor—based on Entrackr’s description—are the operational outcomes of the integrated pipeline and the practical effects of AI-driven iteration. If teams bring visual identity, narrative, and audience positioning into core development, then production milestones may shift earlier in the schedule, with story and visual direction influencing gameplay prototypes sooner. If AI tools are used to explore multiple creative directions, the development process may show more frequent internal concept comparisons and faster convergence on creative choices.

    Entrackr does not mention the title of any specific game, nor does it specify which AI tools or workflows will be used. The partnership illustrates a direction in game development: treating storytelling and visual identity as core inputs to gameplay development, with AI applied to speed up iteration and broaden creative exploration.

    Source: Entrackr : Latest Posts